Dhruv Mehrotra Dell Cameron Security Jun 8, 2026 1:31 PM Meta Deletes Face-Recognition System From Its Smart Glasses App After WIRED Report The code WIRED identified is gone from the latest version of Meta AI, the companion app for the company’s smart glasses. Meta won’t say why or whether it’s coming back. Mark Zuckerberg, chief executive officer of Meta Platforms. Photograph: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg/Getty Images Save this story Save this story One day after WIRED revealed that Meta had quietly embedded an unreleased face-recognition system into an app installed on more than 50 million phones, the company removed it, according to a WIRED analysis of the latest version’s code. The most recent version of Meta AI, a companion app for its line of smart glasses , strips out the unactivated software components that powered the system Meta internally called NameTag. The version published the day of WIRED’s report included several code libraries explicitly named for face recognition. Friday’s release includes none of them. Andy Stone, Meta's vice president of communications, told WIRED on Monday that the feature is purely exploratory, adding: “No final decision has been made on what to do here, if anything.” On Thursday, WIRED reported that Meta had quietly integrated substantial portions of the NameTag system into the Meta AI app. Though never publicly enabled, the feature was designed to convert faces captured by the glasses into unique biometric signatures, commonly known as faceprints, and compare them against a database of faceprints stored on the user's device. WIRED also found that faces the system failed to recognize were cropped, indexed, and stored locally for future processing. NameTag first surfaced in February, when The New York Times , citing internal Meta documents, reported that the company was developing face recognition for its smart glasses and weighing a launch as soon as this year. One memo reportedly described releasing it during a “dynamic political environment,” when privacy and civil liberties advocates would be distracted. Last week, WIRED reported that much of NameTag’s machinery was already built into the Meta AI app, downloaded by millions of users, as early as January, even as Meta publicly said it had made no final decision about face recognition. After WIRED’s report, Stone dismissed the findings, writing that the company couldn’t answer questions about how the system would work because “the feature does not exist.” Andrew Bosworth, Meta’s chief technology officer, called the reporting “incredibly misleading” and “absolutely dishonest.” Got a Tip? Are you a current or former Meta employee who wants to talk about the company's technologies? We'd like to hear from you. Using a nonwork phone or computer, contact the reporter securely on Signal at dmehro.89 or dell.3030. Meta declined to answer 10 questions WIRED posed before publishing on Thursday, including whether it had already created the database of face profiles NameTag uses, how long the app retains photographs and biometric data of unrecognized people stored on a user's device, and whether that data would ever be sent back to Meta's servers. Additionally, Meta did not respond to a question about whether it was building NameTag specifically for blind or low-vision users, and did not respond to criticism from privacy advocates who have warned the system could let stalkers and abusers identify strangers in public. It did not respond when asked whether it planned to let users opt in or opt out of the system. The newly released version of Meta AI removes nearly all traces of the feature Meta said did not yet exist. Gone is the face-recognition software itself, along with the code that ran the NameTag recognition process and the “Person recognized” alert the app would have shown if someone were identified. The update also strips out a folder where the app would have stored the cropped images and biometric signatures of faces it captured but could not identify. Meta did not answer WIRED's questions about why the code was removed or whether the changes were planned before WIRED's story was published. A few fragments of the NameTag system remain in the version of latest Meta AI, including an internal debug menu label and a dormant link meant to open a recognized person’s profile. The leftover code points to parts of the system that are no longer there. Kade Crockford, director of the technology for liberty program at the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, says the removal didn’t undo the original decision to ship the code, and pointed to it as evidence that consumer privacy needs stronger legal protection than Congress has been willing to provide. Crockford notes that the Massachusetts House of Representatives last week unanimously passed a consumer privacy bill that, if enacted as written, would impose strong enforcement provisions, and urged other states to follow, especially with a private right of action that lets aggrieved users sue. “State lawmakers need to do their job and step up to protect consumer privacy,” they say. “Meta’s sneaky tactics in slipping the face-recognition code into its smart glasses show exactly why data privacy bills need the teeth of strong enforcement,” Crockford says. “Companies like Meta prioritize their bottom line, so lawmakers need to speak in the only language its C-suite understands.” Updated 6/8/2026 at 3:05 pm EDT: Added additional comment from a Meta spokesperson and clarified context around the company's communication with WIRED. Comments Back to top You Might Also Like In your inbox: The week’s biggest tech news in perspective The Pentagon did almost nothing to stop enemies from tracking US troops’ phones Big Story: Can normies really vibe code? A hacker group is poisoning open source code at an unprecedented scale Livestream replay: How AI is transforming work Dhruv Mehrotra is an investigative data reporter at WIRED, where he uses technology to find, build, and analyze datasets for accountability journalism. His reporting has examined surveillance, policing, data brokers, platforms, and the government agencies and companies that use them. Before joining WIRED, he worked at Bloomberg News, the Center for ... Read More Senior Correspondent, Investigations Dell Cameron is an investigative reporter from Texas covering privacy and national security. He's the recipient of multiple Society of Professional Journalists awards and is co-recipient of an Edward R. Murrow Award for Investigative Reporting. Previously, he was a senior reporter at Gizmodo and a staff writer for the Daily ... Read More Senior Reporter, National Security Topics Meta privacy surveillance smart glasses artificial intelligence Apps Read More Meta Silently Added Face-Recognition Code for Its Smart Glasses to Millions of Phones Code reviewed by WIRED uncovered an unreleased face-recognition system embedded in Meta’s smart glasses platform. It’s designed to identify people via biometric data stored on users’ phones. Dhruv Mehrotra An Engineer’s Post Protesting Laptop Surveillance Is Going Viral Inside Meta Meta employees in the US and UK are organizing against corporate software that tracks workers’ keystrokes and mouse activity. Paresh Dave You Can Get Some of Your Nudes Removed From the Internet Under a New Law Starting May 19, tech platforms in the US will have to comply with the Take It Down Act. Here’s how more than a dozen major platforms are handling takedown demands for your nonconsensual nudes. Maddy Varner A Bipartisan Amendment Would End Police License Plate Tracking Nationwide One line tucked into a federal highway bill would strip funds from cities and states unless they kill their automated plate tracking programs—effectively banning the tech for all but toll collection. Dell Cameron Greg Brockman Officially Takes Control of OpenAI’s Products in Latest Shake-Up OpenAI is once again reorganizing its executive ranks as part of its effort to unify ChatGPT and Codex into one core product experience. Maxwell Zeff I Gave Gemini Spark Access to My Life. Then It Friend-Zoned My Boyfriend Google’s new AI agent combed through my emails, documents, and calendar to plan a birthday party and still didn’t clock the person most important to me. Reece Rogers The Top New Features in Google’s Android 17—and Gemini Intelligence—Coming This Summer You’ll soon be able to generate your own widgets or ask Gemini to finish a booking in Chrome on Android. Julian Chokkattu AI Just Isn’t Right Can AI do fact-checking? A WIRED fact-checker fact-checks. Meghan Herbst Android Is Fighting Phone Scams With a New Feature to Prove Who’s Calling Available for Android 12 and later, the anti-scam feature is baked into Google Dialer, which sends a silent “confirmation signal” to ensure whoever’s calling you is who they appear to be. Lily Hay Newman Why Apple Might Put Cameras Into Its Next AirPods From battery life to privacy, there are many hurdles to the idea taking off. Sophie Charara Even If You Hate AI, You Will Use Google AI Search The search giant’s AI-crafted answers are so convenient, you’ll be sucked in—to the detriment of the web and the artists and thinkers behind it. Steven Levy WhatsApp Adds Meta AI Chats That Are Built to Be Fully Private The company says its new Incognito Chat allows you to use its AI chatbot without anyone else—including Meta—being able to access your conversations. Lily Hay Newman