- What: Analysis of abandoned AI-related applications on Flathub
- Impact: Developers and users of Linux applications
About a month ago, Flathub announced a ban on slopcoded applications. Evangelos āGeopJrā Paterakis, developer of a number of popular Linux applications and ton of other things, did some research into just how many applications tagged with āAI slopā, a tag Flathub reviewers used to keep track of slopcoded applications submitted to Flathub, actually survived the test of time. The results are exactly what youād expect. Of the 120 unique repos, 32 were maintained and 88 were abandoned. No seriously, a big portion of them was completely deleted, nowhere to be found, others stopped 6 months ago, right after submitting to Flathub. ā« Evangelos āGeopJrā Paterakis Thatās absolutely soul-crushing. Why should Flathubās reviewers spend their precious, limited time talking to lazy slopcodersā āAIā agents to get their slopcoded applications into Flathub, when 70% of these applications are abandoned or outright deleted from existence within mere months of being submitted? Minimal effort for the slopcoders, maximum effort for the reviewers. Just dump a bunch of shitty code over the fence, let a chatbot handle the interactions with the reviewers, and pretend you made a valuable contribution. This is the contradiction slopcode enthusiasts really donāt want to talk about. If these āAIā tools are so great, where is all the amazing new software? Whereās the massive gains in software quality? Isnāt the story that āAIā tools do the menial work, giving programmers more time to focus on improving their software? Reality does not seem to match the story weāre being sold. Despite these slopcode tools being out and available for years now, thereās no influx of great applications and other software, thereās no rise in software quality, nothing. What we mostly seem to be getting are slopcoded projects nobody, not even their ācreatorsā care about, so they just get abandoned and deleted as quickly as they were dredged up from the bottom of the programming barrel. These arenāt applications created because someone wanted them to exist; these are applications created because some mid programmer got high on their āAIā supply and fancied themselves better at programming than they really are ā only to realise once the comedown hits theyāve got crappy, barely working, entirely unmaintainable gibberish vaguely looking like code nobody can make head nor tails of. And then they abandon the project, ready for the next high ā leaving everyone else to clean up their mess. What a miserable workflow.